follow up on manuscript submission

For one of my journals, we ask authors to insert line numbers, again to make the review process smoother for our many manuscript-fatigued reviewers. How do you interpret these test results? By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. The figure title should be a brief descriptive phrase, preferably no longer than 10 to 15 words. Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Describe guidelines (eg, PRISMA, MOOSE) used for abstracting data and assessing data quality and validity. Authors of submitted papers, including those accepted but not yet published, should not disclose the status of such papers during such meeting presentations that occur before the work is published. Intervention study The specific type of study or analysis, population, intervention, exposure, and tests or outcomes should be described for each article or data source. For regression models fit to dependent data (eg, clustered or longitudinal data), the models should account for the correlations that arise from clustering and/or repeated measures. Figures should be submitted as separate files (1 file per figure) and not included in the manuscript text. Manuscript Structure. Most essays published in A Piece of My Mind are personal vignettes (eg, exploring the dynamics of the patient-physician relationship) taken from wide-ranging experiences in medicine; occasional pieces express views and opinions on the myriad issues that affect the profession. sharing sensitive information, make sure youre on a federal Save and continue. Use means and standard deviations (SDs) for normally distributed data and medians and ranges or interquartile ranges (IQRs) for data that are not normally distributed. 2023 American Medical Association. process, focusing on manuscript submission and peer review, affording readers a behind-the-scenes view of the ways in which a new manuscript might be approached by an editor or a reviewer. Each axis on a statistical graph must have a label and units of measure should be labeled. For help with nonfiction proposals, you can consult Jane Friedman's How to Write a Book . This can be facilitated by collaborating with a medical librarian to help with the search. These manuscripts describe an important issue in clinical medicine, public health, health policy, or medical research in a scholarly, thorough, well-referenced, systematic, and evidence-based manner. Can I ask the editor to publish a withdrawn manuscript after acceptance? Report losses to observation or follow up (see Missing Data). This is especially important in close-ups. Letters must not duplicate other material published or submitted for publication and should not include unpublished data. Authors must obtain written permission to include the names of all individuals included in the Acknowledgment section, and the corresponding author must confirm that such permission has been obtained in the Authorship Form. Provide a brief overview of the pathophysiology of the disease. When filming, please use a landscape orientation, not a portrait orientation. All manuscripts reporting clinical trials, including those limited to secondary exploratory or post hoc analysis of trial outcomes, must include a copy of the trial protocol including the complete statistical analysis plan (see Protocols), a CONSORT flow diagram (Figure), and a completed CONSORT checklist. After you provide the required information, Editorial Manager will compile your files into a PDF to send to the journal. How the findings are clinically relevant should be specifically stated. Do not draw extra lines or rulesthe table grid will display the outlines of each cell. All randomized clinical trials should include the results of intention-to-treat analysis as well. Manuscripts that describe identifiable patients that do not have a signed form will not be reviewed. The template will be available to authors with the request for revision. For additional guidance on reporting cluster trials, noninferiority and equivalence trials, pragmatic trials, and trials with patient-reported outcomes, see Extensions of the CONSORT Statement. All authors are required to report potential conflicts of interest including specific financial interests relevant to the subject of their manuscript in the Acknowledgment section of the manuscript2 and in the Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest section of the Authorship Form. Exact values with measure of variability should be reported in the text or table as well as in the abstract. Interventions include but are not limited to drugs, surgical procedures, devices, behavioral treatments, educational programs, dietary interventions, quality improvement interventions, process-of-care changes, and the like. When should we contact the editor to follow up on our submitted manuscript? Do you recommend me contacting the editor in order to follow up on our manuscript? Authors are responsible for all statements made in their work, including changes made during editing and production that are authorized by the corresponding author. For journals, the initial assessment period should take anywhere between 2 and 16 weeks. Even though the expert journal selectors cannot guarantee your manuscript will be accepted by the recommended journals they provide, this service will ensure that you are submitting your work to the most relevant publication possible. JAMA. This feature provides a quick structured synopsis of the Review, following 3 key points: Question, Findings, and Meaning. Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. Application of test result to this patient. These cases should be of interest to clinicians; they should be problems that clinicians are likely to encounter and have an outstanding image that illustrates the disorder and contributes to the diagnostic challenge. Wide tables may be presented using a landscape orientation. If the patient(s) described in these manuscripts is identifiable, a Patient Permission form, which provides consent for publication, must be completed and signed by the patient(s) or family member(s) and submitted with the manuscript. Manuscripts must have no more than 3 authors. For additional guidance on preparing manuscripts reporting cluster trials, noninferiority and equivalence trials, and pragmatic trials, see Extensions of the CONSORT Statement. After about four months, it's our recommendation to write a status inquiry. Authors may appeal decisions. Authors of manuscripts reporting clinical trials must submit trial protocols (including the complete statistical analysis plan) along with their manuscripts. Our submission system is always open 24 hours a day so you have the flexibility to start, edit, or finish a submission at a time that fits your schedule. Reviews should include the clinical question or issue and its importance for general medical practice, specialty practice, or public health. At the time of submission, information on the funding source (including grant identification) must also be completed via the online manuscript submission and review system. Please note: for clinical trials starting patient enrollment after July 2005, trials must have been registered before onset of patient enrollment. If an author's disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is determined to be inaccurate or incomplete after publication, a correction will be published to rectify the original published disclosure statement, and additional action may be taken as necessary. Modified statements or generic statements indicating that all authors had such access are not acceptable. Use nonproprietary names of drugs, devices, and other products and services, unless the specific trade name of a drug is essential to the discussion.2(pp567-569) In such cases, use the trade name once and the generic or descriptive name thereafter. Identify regression models with more than 1 independent variable as multivariable and regression models with more than 1 dependent variable as multivariate. Here are a few tips to get you started! 14. Comments: Only for the line below ("Authors interested in"). Also, provide a statement of relevance indicating implications for clinical practice or health policy, avoiding speculation and overgeneralization. Authors of research studies involving humans should not make independent determinations of exemption or exclusion of IRB or ethical review; they should cite the institutional or regulatory policy for that determination and indicate if the data are deidentified and publicly available or protected by prior consent or privacy safeguards. Cummings P, Rivara FP. Maximum length: 3000 words of text (not including abstract, tables, figures, acknowledgments, references, and online-only material) with no more than a total of 5 tables and/or figures. Authors without conflicts of interest, including relevant financial interests, activities, relationships, and affiliations, should indicate such in their disclosures and include a statement of no such interests in the Acknowledgment section of the manuscript. Manuscripts are not published anonymously or pseudonymously and must have no more than 3 authors. See the Table of Figure Requirements for additional guidance for specific types of figures for suggested resolution and file formats. Limit to no more than 100 words. Include in the manuscript file a title page, abstract, text, references, and as appropriate, figure legends and tables. Accepted manuscripts are edited in accordance with the AMA Manual of Style,2 and returned to the corresponding author (or her/his designee) for approval. One of the most important factors about manuscript submissions is that, often, the editorial process is dependent upon the subject area. Survey with high response rate The basic structure of manuscripts reporting Systematic Reviews should include the following: Abstract (structured abstract of no more than 350 words); Introduction (150-250 words); Methods (150-250 words); Results (1000-1250 words, with the following subsections, if appropriate, depending on the specific question or issue addressed: Pathophysiology, Clinical Presentation, Assessment and Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis); Discussion (1000 words); and Conclusions (2-3 sentences). Subdued medium blue, brown, tan, beige, and green colors all work well for shirt and clothing choices. Privacy Policy| In the manuscript, include a separate section called "Key Points" before the Abstract. If requested, authors should be prepared to provide the data and must cooperate fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees. Findings: In this systematic review, symptoms of chronic sinusitis were improved with saline irrigation and topical corticosteroid therapy compared to no therapy. Unauthorized prepublication release of accepted manuscripts and information about planned publication date may result in rescinding the acceptance and rejecting the paper. Each figure for the main article may be uploaded as a separate file or appended to the end of the manuscript with the figure titles and legends. Research Letters are concise, focused reports of original research. Peer reviewers are required to maintain confidentiality about the manuscripts they review and must not divulge any information about a specific manuscript or its content to any third party without prior permission from the journal editors. Comments: Only for the paragraph below ("Construct tables that summarize"). Approaches based on "last observation carried forward" should not be used. [duplicate]. The "arts" is broadly defined and includes fine art of any kind, literature (including poetry, biography and autobiography, memoir, fiction, and history), television, film, video, interactive media, comedy, theater and performance art, exhibits, music, photography, games, graphic arts (including comics), and more. Errors and requests for corrections are reviewed by editors and authors, and, if warranted, a Correction notice summarizing the errors and corrections is published promptly and linked online to the original article, and the original article is corrected online with the date of correction.15. The site is secure. What should I do if the review process is delayed and the editor is unresponsive? Editors have to recruit reliable reviewers who are qualified. Manuscripts are evaluated according to the following criteria: material is original and timely, writing is clear, study methods are appropriate, data are valid, conclusions are reasonable and supported by the data, information is important, and topic has general interest to readers of this journal. Include all tables at the end of the manuscript file. All references cited within the online-only document must be included in a separate reference section, including those that also were cited in the main manuscript. List abbreviations in the footnote section and explain any empty cells. If this is done and there is more than 1 guideline, a table should be prepared comparing the major features that differ between the guidelines. In addition, a completed PRISMA checklist should be submitted for the items completed that apply to systematic reviews (the checklist items that apply to meta-analyses do not need to be completed for systematic reviews without meta-analysis). Focus on primary outcome(s) and finding(s). To submit a new manuscript, click on the "author" link in the top grey bar, and click on 'start new submission' in the left hand menu. For additional detail on requirements for data presentation in tables, see Statistical Methods and Data Presentation. Letters discussing a recent article in this journal should be submitted within 4 weeks of the article's publication in print. If patient(s) are identifiable in the video, authors must submit a Patient Permission form completed and signed by each patient. Iverson C, Christiansen S, Flanagin A, et al. Treatments should be based on the most recently available and highest level of evidence. If a bibliographic database is used, state the exact indexing terms used for article retrieval, including any constraints (for example, English language or human study participants). For biomarkers, this should include a brief description of the related physiology. Although the degree of specificity needed will depend on the context of what is being reported, specific ages, race/ethnicity, and other sociodemographic details should be presented only if clinically or scientifically relevant and important.2 Cropping of photographs to remove identifiable personal features that are not essential to the clinical message may be permitted as long as the photographs are not otherwise altered. For editorial and review of an initial submission, submit videos according to the following specifications: Verify that the videos are viewable in QuickTime or Windows Media Player before uploading. All symbols, indicators (including error bars), line styles, colors, and abbreviations should be defined in a legend. Stratification by age groups should be based on relevance to disease, condition, or population (eg, <5 or >65 years). The CONSORT checklist also should be completed and submitted with the manuscript.10. Theres no limit! See other details in these instructions for additional requirements.2,4. Authors will be sent notifications of the receipt of manuscripts and editorial decisions by email. Needless to say, in order to perfect your manuscript submission, you need to know who you're targeting. Findings: Results of the study/review. You can use this template to send your inquiry: Dear Dr./ Mr./Ms. Journal Editors and Authors Group. Systematic Reviews without meta-analysis are published as Reviews; those with meta-analysis are published as Original Investigations (see Meta-analysis). For guidance on reports of cost-effectiveness analyses, see the EQUATOR Reporting Guidelines (CHEERS). full info. There are several other preferred systems for rating the quality of evidence in Review articles. Evidence Review:Describe the information sources used, including the search strategies, years searched, and other sources of material, such as subsequent reference searches of retrieved articles. For example, some fees for laboratory tests can be obtained from the Medicare fee schedules. After about four months, its our recommendation to write a status inquiry. My associate editor cannot contact the 2nd reviewer, Manuscript status changed immediately from "With the Editor" to "Decision in Process". The main heading of the online-only text should be in 12 point and boldface; subheadings should be in 10 point and boldface. When possible, present numerical results (eg, absolute numbers and/or rates) with appropriate indicators of uncertainty, such as confidence intervals. Viewpoints must have no more than 3 authors. The number of individuals followed up for each time interval (number at risk) should be shown underneath the x-axis. The same title and caption must be entered in the designated fields in the manuscript submission system when uploading each video. And the ones that don't follow up at all. Also include the statistical software used to perform the analysis, including the version and manufacturer, along with any extension packages (eg, the svy suite of commands in Stata or the survival package in R). For example, see Table 3 (incorrect) and Table 4 (correct). For randomized trials, provide the numbers randomized. Do not submit figures with more than 4 panels unless otherwise justified. Answer: Since the status has remained unchanged for the past two months, I think you can write to the editor inquiring about the status of your paper. A structured abstract is required, and trial registration information (registry name, trial ID, and URL) must be listed at the end of the abstract; for more information, see instructions for preparing Abstracts for Reports of Original Data. Patient Outcome. For guidance on reports of diagnostic tests, see the EQUATOR Reporting Guidelines (STARD). Do not try to align cells with hard returns or tabs; alignment will be imposed in the production system if the manuscript is accepted. For secondary outcomes, address multiple comparisons or consider such analyses as exploratory and interpret them as hypothesis-generating. This should include the original approved protocol and statistical analysis plan, and all subsequent amendments to either document. Sequences of diagnostic tests are best presented as algorithms or in tables. If laboratory or imaging studies are necessary, provide the sensitivity and specificity and diagnostic accuracy of these tests and consider providing positive and negative likelihood ratios. Whenever possible, proportions and percentages should be accompanied by the actual numerator and denominator from which they were derived. [CDATA[> Please also address the correct answer to the question about test interpretation in this section (200 words). Ten tips to help you manage the manuscript submission process from author and member of the W&A team, Clare Povey. 2022;327(24):2448-2449. doi:10.1001/jama.2022.8384. A discussion of controversial or unresolved issues and topics in need of future research also should be included. The reporting of all outcomes should match that included in study protocols. It can be quite nerve-wracking when youve submitted research that youve put tremendous effort into only to hear silence from the book or journal editors. The Methods section should include an explanation of who identified participant race and ethnicity and the source of the classifications used (eg, self-report or selection, investigator observed, database, electronic health record, survey instrument). Specific questions regarding the sharing of data are included in the manuscript submission system. Note: These forms will be requested after a manuscript has been submitted, but authors should also include conflict of interest disclosures in the Acknowledgment section of the submitted manuscript. To demonstrate the relationship between 2 or more quantitative variables, such as changes over time. Categories included in groups labeled as "other" should be defined. To read more about use of causal language, see the AMA Manual of Style. After the critique: revise and resubmit your manuscript. Statement on scientific publication and security. For most studies,Pvalues should follow the reporting of comparisons of absolute numbers or rates and measures of uncertainty (eg, 0.8%, 95% CI 0.2% to 1.8%;P=.13). For a recently published example, see JAMA. This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Unable to load your collection due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error. Refer to Categories of Articles because there may be a limit on the number of figures by article type. The corresponding author also must complete the Acknowledgment statement part of the Authorship Form confirming that all persons who have contributed substantially but who are not authors are identified in the Acknowledgment section and that written permission from each person acknowledged has been obtained (see Acknowledgment Section). Then, those reviewers need to accept the request from the editors, and then complete the full evaluation. At the end of the manuscript, include a title for each figure. Causal language (including use of terms such as effect and efficacy) should be used only for randomized clinical trials. If the manuscript does not report the main planned outcomes of a study, this fact should be stated and the reason indicated. All clinical trials must be registered at an appropriate online public registry. Online-only figures must be combined into the PDF of the online-only supplement (see Online-Only Supplements and Multimedia). The existence of a manuscript under review is not revealed to anyone other than peer reviewers and editorial staff. A structured abstract is required; Systematic Review articles should include a structured abstract of no more than 350 words using the headings listed below. The third paragraph should discuss exactly what material will be covered in the Review (eg, obesity treatments). online manuscript submission and review system. To show data distribution from 1 or more groups, particularly aggregate/summary data. Pvalues should never be presented alone without the data that are being compared. For all other study designs (including meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials), methods and results should be described in terms of association or correlation and should avoid cause-and-effect wording. Do not include an introduction by the physician as a "talking head" explaining a procedure. The basic structure of manuscripts reporting Narrative Reviews should include the following: Abstract (structured abstract of no more than 300 words); Introduction (150-250 words); Methods, if included (150-250 words); Discussion/Observations (1000-1250 words, with the following subsections, if appropriate: Pathophysiology, Clinical Presentation, Assessment and Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis); and Conclusions (2-3 sentences). The relevance statement may also indicate whether additional study is required before the information should be used in clinical settings. a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. We would like to receive common problems presenting uncommonly, rather than unusual or rare conditions (ie, "zebras"). American Association for Public Opinion Research. All those designated as authors should meet all 4 criteria for authorship, and all who meet the 4 criteria should be identified as authors. Images and multimedia (eg, video, audio) are encouraged, including graphic stories. However, for manuscripts under consideration by this journal, publication of full reports in meeting proceedings or online, issuing detailed news releases reporting the results of the study that go beyond the meeting abstract, or participation in formal news conferences will ordinarily jeopardize chances for publication of the submitted manuscript in this journal.5 Media coverage of presentations at scientific meetings will not jeopardize consideration, but direct release of information through press releases or news media briefings may preclude consideration of the manuscript by this journal.5 Rare instances of papers reporting public health emergencies should be discussed with the editor. Fontanarosa PB, Flanagin A, DeAngelis CD. Randomized clinical trials should be primarily analyzed according to the intention-to-treat approach. Letters may have no more than 3 authors. Avoid solely reporting the results of statistical hypothesis testing, such asPvalues, which fail to convey important quantitative information. Comparisons must read across the table columns. This feature provides a quick structured synopsis of the findings of your manuscript (required only for research and review manuscripts), following 3 key points: Question, Findings, and Meaning. Are you ready for a literary agent? Next, the subsections listed below should generally appear in the Results sections of most Reviews although all of these subsections may not be necessary for some topics, depending on the specific question or issue addressed.

Ucsd Provost Honors List, Eso Kireth's Amazing Plan Choice, Lignetics Jaffrey Nh Address, Which Fiduciary Duty Is Impossible With Dual Agency Quizlet, City Of Dearborn Heights Inspection, Is Sandusky County Under A Snow Emergency, What To Expect At First Dentist Appointment In Years, Journey Church Bozeman Denomination, Akihabara Gamers List Ps4, Sharon High School Website, Bob Cummings Net Worth, How To Start A Radio Station Fm,